Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE AORUS 17X outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GIGABYTE AORUS 17X Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 62% better in The Last of Us Part I than TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 - 86 vs 53 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 69% cheaper than GIGABYTE AORUS 17X - €1335.53 vs €4296.93
- Up to 50% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than GIGABYTE AORUS 17X - €25.2 vs €49.96 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 14th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
FPS
86
100%
Value, €/FPS
€49.96/FPS
50.44035228182546%
Price, €
€4296.93
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,296.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66482 minutes ago
FPS
53
61.627906976744185%
Value, €/FPS
€25.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1335.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,335.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66484 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 14th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 14th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
68.10810810810811%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
46.95832254724308%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 14th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
GIGABYTE AORUS 17X Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 14th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 17" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
