Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE AORUS 16X outperforms the cheaper TULPAR A5 V19.2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR A5 V19.2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GIGABYTE AORUS 16X Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 73% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than TULPAR A5 V19.2 - 461 vs 266 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR A5 V19.2 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 63% cheaper than GIGABYTE AORUS 16X - €699.0 vs €1899.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than GIGABYTE AORUS 16X - €2.63 vs €4.12 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 28th, 2024
FPS
461
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.12/FPS
63.83495145631068%
Price, €
€1899
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 518 minutes ago
FPS
266
57.70065075921909%
Value, €/FPS
€2.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€699
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 28th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
51.96656833824975%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27.714051618189266%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 28th, 2024
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
GIGABYTE AORUS 16X Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR A5 V19.2 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 28th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i5-12500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
