Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — TULPAR T6 V1.1.1 outperforms the cheaper ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim Laptop
- Up to 44% cheaper than TULPAR T6 V1.1.1 - €1070.81 vs €1919.0
Advantages of TULPAR T6 V1.1.1 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 184% better in No Man's Sky than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim - 142 vs 50 FPS
- Up to 37% better value when playing No Man's Sky than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim - €13.51 vs €21.42 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Sep 1st, 2021
FPS
50
35%
Value, €/FPS
€21.42/FPS
63%
Price, €
€1070.81
100%
Buy for €1,070.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 415 minutes ago
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1919
55%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Sep 1st, 2021
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
29%
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Sep 1st, 2021
Core i5-11300H
3.1 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1689
64%
Multi-Core
4940
33%
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim Laptop | vs | TULPAR T6 V1.1.1 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2021 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-11300H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
