Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 593 days newer than ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 66% better in Counter-Strike 2 than ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED - 340 vs 205 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 811 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
340
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Sep 16th, 2022 • 1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Sep 16th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Sep 16th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Ryzen 7 6800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1876
78%
Multi-Core
9010
78%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 16th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 6800H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
