Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS TUF F15 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 78 days older than ASUS TUF F15.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 31% better in World of Warcraft than ASUS TUF F15 - 174 vs 133 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
May 1st, 2024
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Jul 18th, 2024 • 14th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jul 18th, 2024 • 14th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jul 18th, 2024 • 14th Variation
Core i5-12500
3.0 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2311
96%
Multi-Core
9079
79%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF F15 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i5-12500 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
