Key Differences
In short — ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VZ-NM038X, 40,64 cm (16 Zoll) 240Hz, i9-13900H, RTX 4080 Notebook outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.8.1 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.8.1 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VZ-NM038X, 40,64 cm (16 Zoll) 240Hz, i9-13900H, RTX 4080 Gaming Notebook
- Performs up to 59% better in Valheim than TULPAR T7 V20.8.1 - 146 vs 92 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.8.1 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 85% cheaper than ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VZ-NM038X, 40,64 cm (16 Zoll) 240Hz, i9-13900H, RTX 4080 Notebook - €1029.0 vs €6679.15
- Up to 76% better value when playing Valheim than ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VZ-NM038X, 40,64 cm (16 Zoll) 240Hz, i9-13900H, RTX 4080 Notebook - €11.18 vs €45.75 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€45.75/FPS
24%
Price, €
€6679.15
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €6,679.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 293 minutes ago
Buy for €1,029 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
68%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
46%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VZ-NM038X, 40,64 cm (16 Zoll) 240Hz, i9-13900H, RTX 4080 Gaming Notebook | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.8.1 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
