Key Differences
In short — ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 Laptop
- Performs up to 38% better in No Man's Sky than TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 - 180 vs 130 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 77% cheaper than ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 - €959.0 vs €4099.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing No Man's Sky than ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 - €7.38 vs €22.77 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 10th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€22.77/FPS
32.41106719367589%
Price, €
€4099
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
FPS
130
72.22222222222221%
Value, €/FPS
€7.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€959
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €959 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 10th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 10th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
47.797681770284505%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
35.20279448864739%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 10th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
91.22340425531915%
Multi-Core
11484
77.81014973914222%
ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 10th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
