Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) outperforms ASUS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) is 369 days newer than ASUS.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 3% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than ASUS - 90 vs 87 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
FPS
90
100%
Value, €/FPS
€23.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2110.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,110.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Jan 18th, 2023 • 10th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 18th, 2023 • 10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 18th, 2023 • 10th Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2744
100%
Multi-Core
16561
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 18th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 22nd, 2024 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 14.5" | Screen Size | 16" |
