Key Differences
In short — Alienware M16 outperforms TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Alienware M16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 24% better in F1 23 than TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 - 224 vs 181 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 51% better value when playing F1 23 than Alienware M16 - €5.69 vs €11.69 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Jan 19th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.69/FPS
49%
Price, €
FPS Winner
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 437 minutes ago
Buy for €1,029 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 438 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Jan 19th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 19th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
68%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
47%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 19th, 2023 • 2nd Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2744
100%
Multi-Core
16561
100%
CPU Winner
Alienware M16 Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |