Key Differences
In short — acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA outperforms ACEMAGIC 16.1“ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 312% better in Battlefield 1 than ACEMAGIC 16.1“ - 165 vs 40 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop
2nd Variation
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop
2nd Variation
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop | vs | ACEMAGIC 16.1“ Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700U |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
