Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72-93HB) outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72-93HB) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 11% better in Counter-Strike 2 than TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 - 398 vs 359 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 40% cheaper than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72-93HB) - €959.0 vs €1599.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72-93HB) - €2.67 vs €4.02 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
398
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
66.4179104477612%
Price, €
€1599
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 386 minutes ago
FPS
359
90.20100502512562%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€959
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €959 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72-93HB) Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 30th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
