Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72-90NP) outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72-90NP) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 - 75 vs 73 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 38% cheaper than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72-90NP) - €1119.0 vs €1799.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dead Space than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72-90NP) - €15.33 vs €23.99 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
75
100%
Value, €/FPS
€23.99/FPS
63%
Price, €
€1799
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2643 minutes ago
Buy for €1,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2647 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72-90NP) Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Jan 22nd, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |