Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-71-96AB) outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-71-96AB) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 - 48 vs 37 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 43% cheaper than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-71-96AB) - €996.0 vs €1749.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-71-96AB) - €26.92 vs €36.44 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FPS
48
100%
Value, €/FPS
€36.44/FPS
73%
Price, €
€1749
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Buy for €996 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-71-96AB) Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Mar 28th, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |