Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Acer Predator Helios 300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1758 days newer than Acer Predator Helios 300.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 46% better in Lost Ark than Acer Predator Helios 300 - 193 vs 132 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Jul 9th, 2019 • 2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jul 9th, 2019 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
57.6 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
144 GTexel/s
59%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jul 9th, 2019 • 2nd Variation
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
60%
Multi-Core
5396
47%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Helios 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 9th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
