Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Acer Predator Helios 300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1369 days newer than Acer Predator Helios 300.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 66% better in Far Cry 5 than Acer Predator Helios 300 - 131 vs 79 FPS
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Aug 1st, 2020 • 4th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Aug 1st, 2020 • 4th Variation
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
75.84 GPixel/s
93%
Texel Fillrate
170.6 GTexel/s
70%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Aug 1st, 2020 • 4th Variation
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
60%
Multi-Core
5396
47%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Helios 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 1st, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
