The Radeon RX 5500 XT is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's €1058.06 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5500 XT
- Up to 88% cheaper – €139.94 vs €1198.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 130 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 175% more VRAM memory – 11 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 5500 XT vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5500 XT
Dec 12th, 2019
Average FPS
73
68%
Min 1% FPS
37
62%
Price, €
€139.94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.91/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Mar 10th, 2017
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€1198
11%
Value, €/FPS
€11.19/FPS
17%
Radeon RX 5500 XT vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5500 XT vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5500 XT vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5500 XT
Dec 12th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
36%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
46%
Pixel Fillrate
59.04 GPixel/s
42%
Texture Fillrate
162.4 GTexel/s
46%
FP32
5.196 TFLOPS
46%
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Mar 10th, 2017
Memory
11 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
484.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
139.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
354.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
11.34 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5500 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 12th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 10th, 2017 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
| Navi | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
130 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 11 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5X |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 352-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 484.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 59.04 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 139.2 GPixel/s |
| 162.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 354.4 GTexel/s |
| 5.196 TFLOPS | FP32 | 11.34 TFLOPS |
