The Radeon RX 550 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 460 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €20.99 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 19% cheaper – €89.00 vs €109.99
- A better value for money for gaming
Radeon RX 550 vs Radeon RX 460 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
92%
Min 1% FPS
20
91%
Price, €
€109.99
80%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
74%
Buy on Amazon
€109.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€99.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€99.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€219.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€96.99
In Stock
Radeon RX 550 vs Radeon RX 460 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 550 vs Radeon RX 460 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 550 vs Radeon RX 460 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
99%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
56%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
56%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 550 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 20th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
| $79.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Polaris | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 18.93 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.2 GPixel/s |
| 37.86 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 67.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.211 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.15 TFLOPS |
