The Radeon RX 480 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6800 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 480
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 150 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6800 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Average FPS
68
43%
Min 1% FPS
34
35%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
159
100%
Min 1% FPS
97
100%
Price, €
€1380.84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.68/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€1,380.84
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€554.30
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,277.00
In Stock
Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
40.51 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
182.3 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
5.834 TFLOPS
28%
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
648 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
20.74 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 480 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
$229.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 40.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 288 GPixel/s |
| 182.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 648 GTexel/s |
| 5.834 TFLOPS | FP32 | 20.74 TFLOPS |
