The Radeon RX 470 is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 470
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 470 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 470
Aug 4th, 2016
Average FPS
65
78%
Min 1% FPS
32
73%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€500.9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.03/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€500.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€299.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€540.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€205.87
In Stock
Radeon RX 470 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 470 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 470 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 470
Aug 4th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
211.2 GB/s
73%
Pixel Fillrate
38.59 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
154.4 GTexel/s
91%
FP32
4.94 TFLOPS
91%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 470 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 4th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
211.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
38.59 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
154.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
4.94 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |