In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R9 M395X is much slower than the Radeon RX 6700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R9 M395X
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 230 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Up to 250% faster in Battlefield 6 – 77 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 250% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Mar 03, 2021 vs May 05, 2015
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 8 GB
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Average FPS
77 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$789
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
42%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
22%
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.21 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 M395X May 5th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 6700 XT Mar 3rd, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Released | Mar 3rd, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $479.00 |
| Gem System (R9 M300) | Generation | Navi II (RX 6000) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
