The Radeon R9 M395X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M395X
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 75 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
57
69%
Min 1% FPS
26
59%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€500.9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.03/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€500.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€299.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€540.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€205.87
In Stock
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
56%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
54%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
54%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M395X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 23.14 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 92.54 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 2.961 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
