The Radeon R9 390X is a faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390X
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 50 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390X vs Radeon Pro W6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390X
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
69
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
93%
Min 1% FPS
32
91%
Price, €
€238.86
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.73/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 390X vs Radeon Pro W6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390X vs Radeon Pro W6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390X vs Radeon Pro W6400 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390X
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
67.2 GPixel/s
90%
Texture Fillrate
184.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.914 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
61%
FP32
3.58 TFLOPS
61%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| $429.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 275 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 67.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.59 GPixel/s |
184.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.9 GTexel/s |
5.914 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.58 TFLOPS |
