The Radeon R9 290 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
The Arc A770 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 225 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Average FPS
65
51%
Min 1% FPS
32
43%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, €
€359.94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.81/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290 vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
20%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
25%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
60.61 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
151.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
4.849 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |