The Radeon R9 285 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6650 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 285
The Radeon RX 6650 XT is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 176 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
58
54%
Min 1% FPS
27
45%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€369.85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.45/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€369.85
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€264.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€549.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€502.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
63%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
30%
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 285 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 190 W | Power Consumption | 176 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 168.6 GPixel/s |
| 102.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 337.3 GTexel/s |
| 3.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.79 TFLOPS |
