The Radeon R9 285 is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5500. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 285
The Radeon Pro W5500 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 34% less energy – 125 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon Pro W5500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
58
79%
Min 1% FPS
27
73%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€598
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.19/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon Pro W5500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
79%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
49%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
63%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
63%
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.224 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 285 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 190 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 59.36 GPixel/s |
| 102.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 163.2 GTexel/s |
| 3.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.224 TFLOPS |
