In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R9 280 is much slower than the Radeon RX 6700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R9 280
- Consumes up to 13% less energy – 200 vs 230 Watts
- Consumes up to 13% less energy
Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Up to 3750% faster in Battlefield 6 – 77 vs 2 FPS
- Up to 3750% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Mar 03, 2021 vs Mar 04, 2014
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 3 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Average FPS
77 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$789
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
25%
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.21 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 280 Mar 4th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 6700 XT Mar 3rd, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 4th, 2014 | Released | Mar 3rd, 2021 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $479.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R9 200) | Generation | Navi II (RX 6000) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
200 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
