The Radeon R9 280 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6650 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 280
The Radeon RX 6650 XT is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 176 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 3 GB
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Average FPS
53
50%
Min 1% FPS
24
40%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€264
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.46/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€264.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€369.85
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€549.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€502.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
31%
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 280 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 176 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.86 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 168.6 GPixel/s |
| 104.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 337.3 GTexel/s |
| 3.344 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.79 TFLOPS |
