The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2080. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 150 vs 215 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2080
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 2080 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
44%
Min 1% FPS
22
34%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2080
Sep 20th, 2018
Average FPS
114
100%
Min 1% FPS
65
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 2080 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 2080 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 2080 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
24%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
24%
GeForce RTX 2080
Sep 20th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
109.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
314.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.07 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 20th, 2018 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 109.4 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 314.6 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.07 TFLOPS |
