The Radeon R7 260X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 115 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 260X vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
40%
Min 1% FPS
21
30%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Buy on Amazon
€284.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€504.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€253.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€262.51
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€271.00
In Stock
Radeon R7 260X vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 260X vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 260X vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
20%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
11%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 260X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$139.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
115 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
