Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1953 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 9% better in Minecraft than Radeon R7 260 - 584 vs 534 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 75 vs 95 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 4 vs 2 GB
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
584
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€412.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €412.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 277 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 260 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$109 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |