In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R7 250X is much slower than the Radeon RX 6900 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R7 250X
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 80 vs 300 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Up to 10300% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 10300% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer – Oct 28, 2020 vs Feb 13, 2014
- Is 6 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 250X vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2259.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$21.73/FPS
100%
![ASRock AMD Radeon RX6900XT Graphics Board GDDR6 16GB [Domestic Authorized Dealer] RX RX 6900 XT PG D 16G OC](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/gpus/B08QYQH7QW.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 250X vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 250X vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 250X
Feb 13th, 2014
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
72 GB/s
14%
Pixel Fillrate
15.2 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
38 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
1.216 TFLOPS
5%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.04 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 250X Feb 13th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 6900 XT Oct 28th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2014 | Released | Oct 28th, 2020 |
$99.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R7 200) | Generation | Navi II (RX 6000) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
80 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
