The Radeon R5 240 OEM is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
48%
Min 1% FPS
15
34%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€500.9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.03/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€500.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€349.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€540.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€228.74
In Stock
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
11%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
