The Radeon R5 230 is a much faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R5 230
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 19 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 1 GB
Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 230
Apr 3rd, 2014
Average FPS
102
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
81%
Min 1% FPS
44
77%
Price, €
€500.9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.03/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€500.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€299.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€540.97
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€205.87
In Stock
Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 230
Apr 3rd, 2014
Memory
1 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
10.67 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
200 GFLOPS
4%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 230 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
19 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 200 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
