In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R5 230 is quite a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R5 230
- Up to 26% faster in Battlefield 6 – 24 vs 19 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 19 vs 75 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
GeForce GTX 1650
- Is 5 years and 19 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Apr 03, 2014
- Is 5 years and 19 days newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
19 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
14 FPS
88%
Price, $
$249.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R5 230
Apr 3rd, 2014
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
10.67 GB/s
8%
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
200 GFLOPS
7%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R5 230 Apr 3rd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2014 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R5 200) | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
19 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
