The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
77%
Min 1% FPS
21
68%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, €
€412.66
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.44/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€412.66
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€422.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€433.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€199.35
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€367.19
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
36%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
82%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
82%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
19.22 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
76.86 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
2.46 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |