The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's €298.41 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 67% cheaper than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti – €148.64 vs €447.05
- A much better value for money when playing games compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti – 65 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- A slightly faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
89%
Min 1% FPS
21
84%
Price, €
€148.64
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.03/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, €
€447.05
33%
Value, €/FPS
€8.13/FPS
37%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
47%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
78%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| 41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| 1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |
