The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GT 610 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only €90.64 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GT 610
- Up to 62% cheaper – €54.99 vs €145.63
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 29 vs 65 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GT 610 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, €
€145.63
37%
Value, €/FPS
€2.97/FPS
47%
GeForce GT 610
Apr 2nd, 2012
Average FPS
39
80%
Min 1% FPS
14
67%
Price, €
€54.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GT 610 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GT 610 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GT 610 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GT 610
Apr 2nd, 2012
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
14.37 GB/s
15%
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
155.5 GFLOPS
9%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GT 610 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2012 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 600 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 29 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.37 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 1.62 GPixel/s |
41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 6.48 GTexel/s |
1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 155.5 GFLOPS |
