The Radeon PRO W7500 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only €173.91 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 70 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Up to 35% cheaper – €327.33 vs €501.24
Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€501.24
65%
Value, €/FPS
€5.96/FPS
80%
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Jul 19th, 2016
Average FPS
69
82%
Min 1% FPS
34
76%
Price, €
€327.33
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.74/FPS
100%
Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
89%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Jul 19th, 2016
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
82.03 GPixel/s
75%
Texture Fillrate
136.7 GTexel/s
72%
FP32
4.375 TFLOPS
36%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon PRO W7500 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 19th, 2016 |
| $429.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
| Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
70 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
108.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 82.03 GPixel/s |
190.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 136.7 GTexel/s |
12.19 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.375 TFLOPS |
