The Radeon Pro W6400 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W6400
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050
The Radeon Pro W6400 is better in every way
Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce GTX 1050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, €
€246.85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.85/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
51
80%
Min 1% FPS
22
69%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce GTX 1050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce GTX 1050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce GTX 1050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.58 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
46.56 GPixel/s
62%
Texture Fillrate
58.2 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
1.862 TFLOPS
52%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W6400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Not Available | MSRP | $109.00 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
74.59 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 46.56 GPixel/s |
111.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 58.2 GTexel/s |
3.58 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.862 TFLOPS |