The Radeon Pro 5300M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 5300M
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 85 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Average FPS
63
49%
Min 1% FPS
31
41%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 5300M vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 5300M vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
40 GPixel/s
13%
Texture Fillrate
100 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
3.2 TFLOPS
16%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 5300M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Alchemist |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
40 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
100 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
3.2 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |