The Radeon 780M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 780M
- Consumes up to 96% less energy – 15 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 780M vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
59
35%
Min 1% FPS
28
27%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, €
€1136.45
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.68/FPS
100%
Radeon 780M vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 780M vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 780M vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
86.4 GPixel/s
29%
Texture Fillrate
129.6 GTexel/s
18%
FP32
8.294 TFLOPS
35%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 780M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
| Navi III IGP | Generation | Navi II |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 86.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| 129.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| 8.294 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |
