Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

GeForce RTX 3080 vs Radeon R7 240

GeForce RTX 3080 vs Radeon R7 240: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

10 GB GDDR6X | 320-bit

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Logo
Gigabyte AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Master 10 GB V3 LHR Grafikkarte, GV-N3080AORUS M-10GD V3

Buy for 1,148.45 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 131 minutes ago

vs

AMD Radeon R7 240

2 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

AMD Radeon R7 240 Logo
QTHREE Radeon R7 240 Grafikkarte, 2G, D5, 128-bit, 2X HDMI, PCI-Express x8 3.0, Grafikkarte für PC

Buy for 94.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 132 minutes ago

FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

10 GB GDDR6X | 320-bit

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Logo
Gigabyte AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Master 10 GB V3 LHR Grafikkarte, GV-N3080AORUS M-10GD V3

Buy for 1,148.45 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 131 minutes ago

vs

AMD Radeon R7 240

2 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

AMD Radeon R7 240 Logo
QTHREE Radeon R7 240 Grafikkarte, 2G, D5, 128-bit, 2X HDMI, PCI-Express x8 3.0, Grafikkarte für PC

Buy for 94.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 132 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce RTX 3080 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 3080 is 2520 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

  • Performs up to 121% better in Ready or Not than Radeon R7 240 - 190 vs 86 FPS
  • Up to 400% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 10 vs 2 GB

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240

  • Up to 92% cheaper than GeForce RTX 3080 - €94.99 vs €1148.45
  • Up to 82% better value when playing Ready or Not than GeForce RTX 3080 - €1.1 vs €6.04 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 91% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 - 30 vs 320 Watts
This is a free version of Ready or Not.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Logo
GeForce RTX 3080

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020


FPS

190

100%

Value, €/FPS

€6.04/FPS

18%

Price, €

€1148.45

8%

FPS Winner

Gigabyte AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Master 10 GB V3 LHR Grafikkarte, GV-N3080AORUS M-10GD V3

Buy for 1,148.45 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 131 minutes ago

AMD Radeon R7 240 Logo
Radeon R7 240

Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013


FPS

86

45%

Value, €/FPS

€1.1/FPS

100%

Price, €

€94.99

100%

Value Winner

QTHREE Radeon R7 240 Grafikkarte, 2G, D5, 128-bit, 2X HDMI, PCI-Express x8 3.0, Grafikkarte für PC

Buy for 94.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 132 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Logo
GeForce RTX 3080

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020

AMD Radeon R7 240 Logo
Radeon R7 240

Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013

Theoretical Performance

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Logo
GeForce RTX 3080

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020


Pixel Fillrate

164.2 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

465.1 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon R7 240 Logo
Radeon R7 240

Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013


Pixel Fillrate

5.6 GPixel/s

3%

Texel Fillrate

14 GTexel/s

3%

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

vs
AMD Radeon R7 240 Logo

AMD Radeon R7 240

Sep 1st, 2020
Release DateOct 8th, 2013
GeForce 30GenerationVolcanic Islands
$699MSRP
$69
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
1x 12-pinPower ConnectorsNone
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
10 GB
Memory2 GB
GDDR6XTypeGDDR5
320-bitBus128-bit
760.3 GB/s
Bandwidth73.6 GB/s
1440 MHz
Base Clock Speed650 MHz
1710 MHz
Boost Clock Speed700 MHz
1188 MHz
Memory Clock Speed1150 MHz

Builds Using GeForce RTX 3080 or Radeon R7 240

Ready or Not, 1920 x 1080, Epic

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.