Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce MX330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 2113 days older than GeForce MX330.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 10 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 7100% better in Overwatch 2 than GeForce MX330 - 72 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX330 - 4 vs 2 GB
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1531 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
1594 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |