Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 980 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 342 days newer than GeForce GTX 980.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 165 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than GeForce GTX 980 - 90 vs 83 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GeForce GTX 980
Desktop • Sep 19th, 2014
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 980
Desktop • Sep 19th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
77.82 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
155.6 GTexel/s
60%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 19th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$549 | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 256-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 224.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1127 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1216 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1753 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
