Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GTX 750 GM206 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 623 days older than GeForce GTX 750 GM206.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 60 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than GeForce GTX 750 GM206 - 537 vs 514 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 - 3 vs 2 GB
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2015
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
39.65 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.65 GTexel/s
37%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 700 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1087 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1239 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
