Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1211 days newer than GeForce GTX 690.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 42% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GTX 690 - 44 vs 31 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 - 175 vs 300 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 - 4 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 690
Desktop • May 3rd, 2012
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 690
Desktop • May 3rd, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
32.61 GPixel/s
50%
Texel Fillrate
130.4 GTexel/s
50%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| May 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| $999 | MSRP | $649 |
| 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 256-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 192.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 915 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1019 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
