Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 680M outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 680M is 1826 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 39 vs 37 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M - 35 vs 100 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
37
94%
Value, €/FPS
€10.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€398
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 573 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
21.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
84.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
91%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
115.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
719 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
758 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |