Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1253 days newer than GeForce GTX 680.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 23 than GeForce GTX 680 - 178 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 - 175 vs 195 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 - 4 vs 2 GB
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GTX 680
Desktop • Mar 22nd, 2012
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 680
Desktop • Mar 22nd, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
33.86 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
135.4 GTexel/s
52%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$499 | MSRP | $649 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 256-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 192.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1006 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1058 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
