Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1959 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 100% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 48 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 50 vs 120 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1660
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
7%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
Mar 14th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $219 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
