Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1042 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 23% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Radeon Pro W6400 - 100 vs 81 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - €101.16 vs €214.12
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 50 vs 120 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €101.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74208 minutes ago
Buy for €214.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
87.05648926237161%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
71.2285168682368%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 14th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$219 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |